The hierarchical system of mechanisms is outlined to account for the creative dialogue that may occur between personality and the objective world. It is proposed that each level of creative interaction manifests itself through opposite, mutual complement pairs of mechanisms:
The axiological (Idealization vs. Problematization), cognitive (Decentration vs. Simplification), emotional (Identification vs. Meditation), and behavioural (Self-actualization vs. Personification).
This unified system of opposite mechanisms manifests itself as a “double helix of creativity” and allows us to consider the process of bringing into existence as an assembly of complementary elements and constructing the whole.
The dynamic multilevel system of mutually connected mechanisms is a generated matrix and core structure of the creative vision and creative attitude toward the world. Also, it may serve as an effective method for finding and solving diverse life problems and conflicts, as a method of stimulating creative activity, or as a form of creative self-training and meditation.
Creativity manifests itself as the real essence of being. That is why its main laws and mechanisms can be concluded from the most general and universal principles of the structure and development of the world. However phenomenological wealth and variability of nature do not allow us to speak about the identity of things, but only about the unity of continuity, and unity of certain rules of change (Wolman, 1965). Namely, mechanisms of evolution and creativity reflect universal processes of transition and serve as invariant patterns of change.
It is no wonder that today the leading researchers of creativity show increasing interest in its philosophical, essence and global questions (Hofstadter, Floistad, Feldman, Csikszentmihalyi, Gardner, Barron, Stein, Sternberg, Simonton, Torrance, Runco). Besides today some authors elaborate on the general theory of creativity - called cryptology (Isaksen, Murdock, Magyari -Beck).
Some both the simplest and the most generalized principles should be laid down in a basis of organizing framework. Such a universal category as interaction can be considered as one of the basic conceptions of creativity theory. This idea is put forward and is supported by many authors (Amabile, 1983; Csikszentimihalyi, 1988; Gardner, 1993). Moreover, the necessity of a more steadfast study of space of creative interaction and the peculiarities of its various types is emphasized: additive, synergetic, and modifying (Albert, Runco, 1990).
It is especially essential to realise that the space of creative interaction represents a completely special type of coherent, coinciding reality, having its own, specific laws. Thus the subject and object manifest themselves not as opposite poles, but as inseparable parts and aspects of the whole. Moreover, any change in one pole leads to changes in the other. This specific space of synergetic resonance is guided by the laws of universal order, by the definite rules or grammars of harmony and beauty. It gets new dimensions and appears as a special kind of environment, saturated by new opportunities.
Besides, the creative interaction has an immanent recursive character. Such numerous copies and models which are produced by the definite set of generative rules still interact among themselves, guided and submitted to the same basic laws or "generative grammars" (Chomsky, Anisimov).
In the most general sense, creativity can be considered as mutual reflection and mutual enrichment of systems, therefore new essences and forms are born. Thus mechanisms of creativity can be understood as the highest level of manifestation of the fundamental principles of nature, and the basic patterns of changes and evolution.
At a social-psychological level, it is revealed as a creative interaction of the person with the world, other people, and self. Thus the dialogue between a person and the Absolute, Supreme values, Culture, Mystery, History, Virtual future and Domain has a special significance. At the same time, the universal structure of dialogue penetrates all levels of complexity and manifests itself in the polycyclic interaction of hemispheres of a brain, in mutual penetration of conscious and subconscious, logic and intuitive, abstract and imagery, in a spontaneous combination of diverse, especially opposite, ideas and images.
The recursive character of creative self-consciousness allows us to reflect and to contain the opposite poles and the whole space of interaction. It presumes the persons overcome narrow frameworks of ego, rise over dialogue and find the centred state, the integral vision of the self, world and their relations. Thus the person occupies a position of centre (Assagioli,1965), centre of pure awareness, experience and will, centre of self-organizing, transformation and choice, a centre that allows pronouncing courageous and sacramental creative word -"Fiat"!
The answer to the question "How is creativity possible?” can be addressed by revealing the basic mechanisms of creative activity - definite groups and links of operation, repetitive patterns of changes, and rules of manipulation of internal and external stimulus.
The definition of the basic mechanisms of laws, interrelations and processes is the supreme and final aim of every science. On the one hand, it allows us to substantially simplify complex phenomena and to achieve a high level of understanding of their vital essence. On the other hand, it makes it possible to transform a system of mechanisms into a system of practical techniques and by that to facilitate the realisation of energy of knowledge.
So it is possible to suggest that :
- there are specific social-psychological mechanisms of creativity that are formed and manifest themselves in creative dialogue person with the world;
- the unified, hierarchical system of creative mechanisms reflects an integral system of universal evolutionary principles and mechanisms;
- this same system of mechanisms lays on the basis of varieties of a person’s creative manifestations.
The creative interaction between the person and the world has a complex, multi-level character, which reflects the universal structure of all integrative objects. This fundamental, united structure is reflected in a hierarchical creative attitude of the personality, which includes axiological, cognitive, affective and behavioural components, where the first component is not the highest separated level of the structure, but its basic system-forming factor, the core and centre of the organization. Each of these components manifests itself through the means of the appropriate pairs of opposed, complement mechanisms of creativity:
Table Double Helix of Creativity Mechanisms
Idealization |
Problematization |
is understood as seeking, vision and revealing the ideal nature of the object, the mental construction of its ideal image in which supreme values are harmoniously blended and the vital contradictions are resolved. It is a new opportunity to find, and fulfil of supertask and ideal plan, generate of daring hypothesis, embodiment a pragmatic and aesthetic ideal, and the realisation of the ideal final result. |
is a revelation, discovery and intensification of vital contradictions of the object, problem finding and problem construction. It is perception and searches for shortcomings, blanks, discord, asymmetry and imperfections of objects. It is a strive for the splitting of the united object, finding opposite, complementary features of phenomena, such as vision and anti-objects, its dark sides and “shadows”. |
Realization of the bunch pair of opposed mechanisms "Idealization - Problematization" manifests itself as a process and ability to reveal a vital problem, which reflects the contradiction between ideal and reality, capacity to use the energy of tension and asymmetry. It reveals the ability to consider conflict and problem as a creative challenge and to resolve them in an effective, elegant and human way guided by ideal tasks and plans. |
Decentration |
Simplification |
manifests itself in a personal ability to create different approaches toward an interaction object, to change one's mind and to take into account various points of view. This mechanism represents the process of mental replacement of habitual connections by different unusual ones, undermining and deviation from traditional patterns of thinking, destruction of traditional notions, mental inertia and stereotypes overcoming. It is the process of generating various ideas and images and mental manipulation and their transformation. |
is understood as getting rid of something complicated inconsequential, tangled, insignificant and confusing, as achievement of clarity and elegance of the form and at the same time depth and accuracy of the contents. It is the ability to concentrate upon the essence of an object and express its complexity through simple, separate notions. It is the capacity to choose and select combinations based on criteria of hidden order, harmony and beauty. |
The bunch of mechanisms “Decentration – Simplification” is a generation of multifarious ideas and choosing the most elegant and useful things. |
Meditation |
Identification |
||
is aloofness and feelings of isolation from the outer and inner world, maintaining necessary distance from the object of interaction, impassive and fresh perception of its nature, real relationships, its harmony, beauty and symmetry. It is a vision of the world and oneself in a new way through familiarization or making familiar things and phenomena to be strange. |
is realised by means of active immersion, the embodiment in objects and their circumstances, blending with them and experiencing emotional resonance. By means of this mechanism, personality is absorbed in the object of material and non-material nature transfers into them and gets to know their internal impulses and circumstances. This striving to be similar to another object is expressed by the Sanskrit formula: “Tat twam asi” ("That you are"). |
The bunch “Identification- Meditation” manifests itself as making the strange familiar and the familiar strange. |
Self-actualization |
Personification |
||
is understood as a process of the most complete and long-lasting revelation and development of one's personal potential, as a need for unified self-realization of creative possibilities. Mechanisms of self-actualization reflect not only the free and spontaneous self-expression of a subject, but also its internal activity, ability to make efforts, and come with an initiative aimed at self-mobilization, and maxim realization of one's own creative potential. Integrated self-fulfilment involves a realization of one's own creative potential, designs, plans, and ideal models. |
|
The bunch "self-actualization-personification” manifests itself as an alternation of spontaneous activity and stops for optimum use of the energy and possibilities of internal and external structures. |
Authors of the paintings: J. Warren, M. Escher, E. Taylor, R. Olbinski, W. Siudmak, Z. Beksinski, M. Parkes. |
Sergey L. Markov. Mechanisms of Creative Dialogue With the World. Paper presented at the 105th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Chicago, 1997.
1. Sergey L. Markov. Kvintological approach to the construction of a unified theory of creativity
Markov, S.L. (2012). Kvintologichnyi pidhid do pobudovy edynoi teorii tvorchosti [Kvintological approach to the construction of a unified theory of creativity]. Pravnychyi visnyk universitetu “KROK”, 11, 160 -171.
2. Sergey L. Markov. Сreative approach to security management
Markov, S.L. (2012) Tvorcheskiy podhod k upravleniiu bezopasnostiu [ Сreative approach to security management]. Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii obrazovaniia [News of the Russian Academy of Education]. 2 (22), 403-415.
3. Sergey L. Markov. Creative management and management of creativity in the modern creatological formation
Markov, S.L. (2015) Tvorche upravlinia i upravlinia tvorchistiu v novitniy kreatologichnit formacii [Creative management and management of creativity in the modern creatological formation] In V.K. Gizhevskiy, S.L. Markov (Eds.), Legal and socio-psychological dimensions of modern information society (pp. 252-266). Кyiv: KROK University.
4. Sergey L. Markov. Formation of creative vision of an individual as the universal method of enhancing creativity
Markov, S.L. (2011) Formuvannia tvorchogo bachennia osobystosti jak universalnyi metod aktivizacii tvorchosti [Formation of creative vision of an individual as the universal method of enhancing creativity]. In S.D. Maksimenko & L.M. Karamushka (Eds.), Actualni problemy psichologii. Vol 1. (pp. 374-380). Kyiv: Publishing House “A.C.K”.
5. Sergey L. Markov. A genetic approach to the nature of genius
Markov, S.L.(2011) Genetuchnyi pidhid do pryrody genialnosti [A genetic approach to the nature of genius]. In 2th International scientific conference: Genesis of the personality's existence. Kyiv, 19-20 December 2011. Kyiv: Information and Analytical Agency, Vol.1, pp.255-260.
6. Sergey L. Markov. Mechanisms of creative dialogue with the World
Markov, S. L. (1997) Mechanisms of Creative Dialogue With the World. Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 17, 1997. Chicago, IL.
7. Sergey L. Markov. Sense creation in the structure of processes of meaning dynamics
Markov, S.L. (2013). Smyslotvorchist v structuri procesiv smyslovoi dynamiki [Sense creation, in the structure of processes of meaning dynamics]. Pravnychyi visnyk universitetu “KROK”, 15, 183-192.
8. Sergey L. Markov. Personal mechanisms of sense creation
Markov, S.L. Osobystisni mechanizmy smyslotvorchosti [Personal mechanisms of sense creation]. Pravnychyi visnyk universitetu “KROK”, 16. P.265-274
Sergey L. Markov. Kvintological approach to the construction of a unified theory of creativity
Abstract. The model and method for the construction of unified theory of creativity are proposed. The universal principle of the centered penta-structure was laid in the base of the theory formation. This principle allows to construct the system of coherent measurements and categories of creativity and to present a classical model of creativity in the form 4Ps / S - process, product, person, place as well as the sense which generates and integrates them. The deployment of these central categories leads to the creation of such relevant specific theories of creativity as a problem-solving process, productive activity, self-actualization, creative dialogue, creative vision and sensecreation.
Key words: unified theory of creativity, methodological grounds, kvintological approach, pentabasis, model of creativity.
Markov, S.L. (2012). Kvintological pidhid do pobudovy edynoi teorii tvorchosti [Kvintological approach to the construction of a unified theory of creativity]. Pravnychyi visnyk universitetu “KROK”, 11, 160 -171.
Sergey L. Markov. Mechanisms of Creative Dialogue with the World
Markov, S. L. (1997) Mechanisms of Creative Dialogue With the World. Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 17, 1997. Chicago, IL.
Abstract. The variant of theoretical framework that helps to harmonize and simplify modern creativity theory is suggested. The given conception is based on the idea of universal nature of creativity, and the existence of definite invariant evolutionary principles and mechanisms.
The framework is built on such universal categories as Interaction, Dialogue and Game. The answer to the question is not only “Where is? “, but both “How is?” creativity is proposed . Thus a hierarchical system of mechanisms is outlined to account for the creative dialogue that may occur between personality and the objective world. It is proposed that every level of creative interaction manifests itself through opposite, mutual complement pairs. These interactions constitute the workings of the mechanisms and include:
The axiological (Idealization vs. Problematization), cognitive (Decentration vs. Simplification), emotional (Identification vs. Meditation), behavioural (Self-actualization vs. Personification).
This unified system of opposite mechanisms manifests itself as a “double helix of creativity” and allows to consider process of bringing into existence as an assembly of complement elements and constructing to the whole.
The system of connected mechanisms allows the creative vision. It is an integral part of the creative attitude toward the world. It can serve as an effective method for the finding and solving of diverse life problems and conflicts, as a method of stimulating creative activity, or as a form of creative self-training and meditation.
Key words: framework for creativity, theories of creativity, creative dialogue, creative mechanisms, double helix of creativity